Posts by Nick Cassella

Daily Clips: May 16th, 2016

Daily Clips: May 16th, 2016

Traditional  economists are getting defensive:  Traditional economists are starting to get uncomfortable with all this criticism directed towards their profession. Their blind allegiance to neat formulas over actual real world application is very bizarre, to say the least. A recent article by Michael Strain, who works for the conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute, pleads with economics doubters to stop doubting and to just drink the kool-aid: An economics 101 textbook is a treasure. The information therein captures the leaps forward in intellectual history, in our understanding of society — indeed, in our understanding of daily life. Disagreements slow Pentagon’s plan to allow transgender service members:  There are roughly 12,800 transgender service members in our military today. That’s a lot. While the Pentagon’s progress on the issue has been lackluster, the consensus seems to be that their policies will change and the military will have full gender inclusion soon enough. Knock on wood. SCOTUS punts on latest Obamacare birth control damage:  The birth control mandate has been sent back to lower courts. Confronting the parasite economy:  Nick Hanauer’s latest piece defines what he calls the “parasite economy” — an economy “where companies large and small cling to low-wage business models out of ignorance or habit or simple greed.” Why is that a problem? Hanauer explains: According to data compiled by the Brookings Institution, 73 million Americans —nearly one-quarter of our population—live in households eligible for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), a benefit exclusively available to the working poor. I want to underscore this point. Nearly a quarter of our fellow citizens are poor—not because they don’t have jobs, but because they or their family members do—mostly working for giant profitable corporations. These are people who labor long hours preparing our food, stocking our shelves, cleaning our offices, caring for our children, and performing the many other tasks and services that define our modern way of life. Tweet of the day: The free market is a hell of a thing. https://t.co/yCYTjV9zZC pic.twitter.com/6WaVF3AFKV — Matt Pearce
+ Read More

Daily Clips: May 13th, 2016

Daily Clips: May 13th, 2016

Americans don’t actually miss manufacturing they miss unions:  Our politicians today lionize manufacturing jobs as if they represent the apex of work. That fixation is misplaced, however. What they’re really celebrating is actually the basic workplace benefits which came from this type of work via unions. Yet we never hear politicians say that. Why? Well, because then they’d actually have to put forward policies which broadened labor standards to those outside of unions. The upside of lowering urban inequality:     US to schools – give transgender students bathroom rights:  Wow. When I saw this news last night, I couldn’t believe it. While the Obama administration’s guidance is not legally binding, it sets a precedent and a tone which is incredibly inclusive. For all of your political failings, here is a moment we can celebrate and feel proud of. Tweet of the day: U.S. immigration plans deportation raids targeting women and children https://t.co/AgFLI7zE87 pic.twitter.com/ipVZ6tZWxx — HuffPost Politics (@HuffPostPol) May 13, 2016        

Daily Clips: May 12th, 2016

Daily Clips: May 12th, 2016

Congress is failing to fight Zika virus:  Deja vu all over again. “Republicans played politics two years ago with the Ebola epidemic, and now they’re stalling on the president’s funding request to fight Zika.” We are so dysfunctional. It pains me. US jobless claims hit more than one-year high:  Here’s a sober reminder that the American economy is not nearly as wonderful as (some) Democrats make it sound. Despite the jump last week, claims have remained below 300,000, a threshold associated with healthy job market conditions, for 62 consecutive weeks, the longest stretch since 1973. The four-week moving average of claims, considered a better measure of labor market trends as it irons out week-to-week volatility, increased 10,250 to 268,250 last week, the highest level in almost three months. The middle class is shrinking everywhere in the US:   The decline of the American middle class is ‘a pervasive local phenomenon,’ according to Pew, which analyzed census and American Community Survey data in 229 metros across the country, encompassing about three-quarters of the U.S. population. In 203 of those metros, the share of adults in middle-income households fell from 2000 to 2014. Tweet of the day: "Don't let mosquitos bite you" – almost as bad as, "Try not to get pregnant" #zika #publichealth pic.twitter.com/tgirlYgiUr — Steph Herold (@StephHerold) May 12, 2016

Daily Clips: May 11th, 2016

Daily Clips: May 11th, 2016

Should the middle class fear the world’s poor?  A nuanced article that looks at recent research on globalization and its affect on the middle class of Western nations. Very worthy of your time. Trump surges in new national poll: The worst way to wake up. Thomas Friedman on the foreign policy goals of the next POTUS:  The column is littered with some dubious fear-mongering (“These suicidal jihadist-nihilists are not trying to win; they just want to make us lose.”), but for the most part Friedman’s take on world affairs is accurate. He also takes a few shots at Obama’s foreign policy “victory lap” – which is unexpected. Hillary Clinton wants to let people buy in to Medicare:  What does that exactly mean? People who don’t get health insurance through their job and earn too much to qualify for Medicaid could buy insurance from the government rather than from a private company. In the public option scenario, the government insurer would have a new name and would be open to people of all ages. In the Medicare buy-in scenario the government insurer would be called “Medicare” and access to it would be limited by age. Clinton spoke specifically of “people 55 or 50 and up,” which is broader than the 55 and up that was considered by the Senate back in 2009. Bernie’s response is, well, very Bernie-esque – and by that I mean valid: Secretary Clinton’s proposal to let the American people buy into Medicare is a step in the right direction, but just like her support for a $12 minimum wage, it is not good enough.

Daily Clips: May 10th, 2016

Daily Clips: May 10th, 2016

This is the opinion section for the Washington Post. The media is out of control. There are infinite amount of important stories which need to be run, which need to be understood, which need to be unveiled, but these clowns continue to be hypnotized by He Who Must Not Be Named. The cost of low wages to our economy: A fascinating new report examines poverty and public assistance in the manufacturing workers. Best-paid U.S. hedge fund managers take home $13 billion : “Hedge funds lost money for their investors last year but the industry’s top-paid managers had a banner year, with five men earning more than $1 billion each in 2015, an industry survey released on Tuesday showed.” Amazing graph that may only interest me: Velocity of money “is the number of times one unit of money is spent to buy goods and services per unit of time.”

Daily Clips: May 9th, 2016

Daily Clips: May 9th, 2016

Donald Trump or Pauly Ryan? Who’s #1? Maureen Dowd imagines how Trump and Ryan’s meeting on Capitol Hill, where she creates witty dialogue and unveils sound political observations. Here’s my favorite passage: ‘I never use the same adjective twice,’ Trump replies coolly. ‘As you know, I do have killer instincts. That’s how I knocked out 16 losers. So let’s try a few names for kicks. Pious Paul? Pompous Paul? Phony Paul? Back-Stabbing, Blindsiding Paul who hung me out to dry to protect his own presidential ambitions for 2020?’ Ryan blanches, protesting: ‘No, no, I just want us to come together with a positive vision.’ The South’s Confederate-monument problem isn’t going away : It turns out that the South started building a ton of monuments to defenders of the “lost cause” in the years following the Civil War. The sheer amount around today means that many towns and cities will be confronted with some controversial decisions. Dark-skinned economist profiled for making notes in “strange code” while on airplane : We are a xenophobic and racially charged nation now, even without He Who Must Not Be Named at the helm. Seattle schools have biggest white-black achievement gap in state : Depressing, but not at all surprising.

Daily Clips: May 6th, 2016

Daily Clips: May 6th, 2016

Raise wages, kill jobs? Seven decades of historical data find no correlation between minimum wage increases and employment levels: Wow. The National Employment Law Project released a groundbreaking study yesterday which examined “the historical data relating to the 22 increases in the federal minimum wage between 1938 and 2009 to determine whether or not these claims —that if you raise wages, you will lose jobs—can be substantiated.” The short answer: no. They found “no correlation between federal minimum-wage increases and lower employment levels, even in the industries that are most impacted by higher minimum wages.” US adds 160,000 jobs:  The unemployment rate stayed put at 5%. It’s not the best report, though, as the data “provided an unexpectedly downcast signal about the nation’s labor market: A surge of Americans dropped out of the workforce and hiring in several key industries, including construction and manufacturing, all but stalled.” Hillary Clinton doesn’t need to choose between a reassuring campaign and progressive policies:   Clinton doesn’t have a realistic chance of securing large Democratic majorities. The House districts are sufficiently tilted that even securing a narrow one would be a very steep uphill fight, and any Democratic majority would depend heavily on relatively moderate members holding Republican-leaning districts. But it’s still the case that even a small Democratic majority reliant on moderate legislators would pass more progressive legislation — hiking the minimum wage, raising taxes, expanding Medicaid funding, etc. — than a Republican one. Tweet of May: The best taco bowls are made by immigrants who resent a rich prick calling them rapists. Love inauthentic Mexican! pic.twitter.com/9tEORJxoZp — Full Frontal (@FullFrontalSamB) May 5, 2016  

Daily Clips: May 5th, 2016

Daily Clips: May 5th, 2016

Rule on arbitration would restore right to sue banks: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is “unveiling a proposed rule on Thursday that would restore customers’ rights to bring class-action lawsuits against financial firms, giving Americans major new protections and delivering a serious blow to Wall Street that could cost the industry billions of dollars.” Thankfully, the proposed rule doesn’t need congressional approval, so it seems certain that this will become law. Democrats are built to win in 2016:  According to Peter Beinart at the Atlantic, “the party’s current iteration is tailor-made to defeat xenophobia and take down Donald Trump.” He goes onto analyze why “since 2004, Americans who exhibit higher levels of ‘racial resentment’ have moved toward the GOP and those who exhibit lower levels have moved toward the Democrats.” National prayer day is not secular:  The US is not a Christian nation. If you think we are because a majority of our people are Christian, then by that logic we should also be called a white nation. Don’t fool yourselves. Tweet of the day: Just another day in Washington State. 17-year-old girl fatally shot in Burien; 17-year-old boy arrested https://t.co/c1icWoHU6N — The Seattle Times (@seattletimes) May 5, 2016

Daily Clips: May 4th, 2016

Daily Clips: May 4th, 2016

Let me first address the major topic of the day: Donald Trump’s victory. No, liberals, this doesn’t represent a “ death of the Republican Party .” This is what you call an adaption. They’ve switched their focus from “principled conservatism” to rampant, angry nationalism. Trump recognized this and gave the base what it wanted. Sorry, Jeb! and Scott Walker, “tax cuts and deregulation” won’t cut it anymore. Democrats couldn’t have asked for a better candidate to face in 2016. The White House and Senate are now ours for the taking. Alex Jones celebrates Trump’s victory by telling George Will, “Blow what little is left of your brains out.”  Classy. Harnessing the power of the new working class:   But when labor is weak, as it is now, it lacks the political and economic juice required to win its own battles, much less to pass remedial legislation on its own behalf. Tweet of the day:  Data: The parties no longer deliver candidates Americans can respect. Troubling. pic.twitter.com/w1nYhN3qQ0 — Edward Snowden (@Snowden) May 4, 2016

Young Americans are Fleeing the GOP. Will Democrats Screw This Up?

Young Americans are Fleeing the GOP. Will Democrats Screw This Up?

I recently pointed out that Democrats tend to think progress either occurs incrementally or through dramatic change. These distinct theories of change can help us understand why certain voters support a given candidate. Age, I reasoned, was the best indicator of how individuals understood societal progress. Generally speaking, the dramatic-change camp is occupied by younger voters, while incrementalist tendencies are exhibited by older individuals (yes, I realize there are older individuals who support Bernie Sanders and younger people who love Hillary Clinton). While I still remain hopeful that Democrats will be demographically forced to abandon incrementalism, I’m becoming more skeptical — especially after I saw findings from  a new survey of American adults  which shows that Republicans have lost significant ground with young voters in the last year alone (emphasis mine): Sixty-one percent of 18-to-29 year-olds prefer that a Democrat be elected president in the fall, while 33 percent of those surveyed back a Republican. That gap of 28 percentage points has nearly doubled since a similar poll conducted last year … In pursuit of votes from their xenophobic and misogynistic base, Republicans have been forced into an awful short-term electoral strategy. By doing so, the GOP has abandoned young voters, which not only happens to be myopic, but also a terrible long-term strategy as a host of research shows. Partisan identification in one’s early years becomes “ a remarkably stable factor over a voters’ life .” So when you have nearly 51% of “millennials identifying as Democrats or leaning Democratic, compared with 35% who identify with the GOP or lean Republican ,” you’re alienating the next generation for (perhaps) the rest of their lives. That’s not an exaggeration. An influential work on party identification, The American Voter (1964), found that “persons who identify with one of the parties typically have held the same partisan tie for all or almost all of their adult lives.” Everything which I’ve just laid out seems to be excellent news for Democrats. So why am I nervous about these findings? Here’s the rub. The Republican surrender of the youth vote could benefit the conservative movement in a key way: it
+ Read More